Beverly Hills Rhinoplasty Surgery Blog

Plastic surgery today has become widely accessible and more socially acceptable. The result has been a much wider public understanding and acceptance of plastic surgery across the spectrum, including the various ethnic populations that make up the world and, particularly, the United States. As a result we see patients from around the world that make up almost any ethnicity one could think of. The key to good outcomes for all of these patients is an individualized approach that seeks to identify the nose that would best suit each person’s unique face. In general, the traditional “reduction” rhinoplasty that is done for Caucasian patients is usually not best for many ethnic patients who have thicker skin, but for us this does not mean that the costs for this surgery needs to be more. Occasionally, anesthesia costs or facility costs may be higher, simply because it may take longer to harvest needed cartilage to build the bridge, but the difference in fees from standard rhinoplasty is generally nominal.

We have recently heard from a couple of prospective patients who are concerned about having open rhinoplasty to narrow the tip and a nostril narrowing procedure (alar base reduction) at the same time. They had been to see other surgeons who had advised against this because of fear of risk to the blood supply of the nasal tip.

Quite frankly, we were a little surprised by this recommendation. The beauty of surgery is that it is not an exact science and there are many ways to arrive at the desired goal. However, the concern that tip rhinoplasty and nostril narrowing, when done together, might compromise the blood supply to the tip skin is really unfounded. In fact, most surgeons who make rhinoplasty a focus of their practice will tell you that they routinely perform these procedures together without issue. That has been our experience.

Some surgeons also advocate waiting to do nostril narrowing as a second procedure so that they can better assess how much narrowing is needed. To the contrary, we have found that we can very readily assess at the time of the initial tip work how much nostril reduction is needed if at all. To our minds, the initial surgery is the best time at which to make these desired changes to create a tip that is balanced and harmonious by reducing nostril width, flare, and asymmetry. We leave this part of the procedure to the very end so we can best determine how much nostril width and flare is still an issue after the other tip enhancements have been achieved. In experienced hands, the minimal swelling that occurs during surgery is not a factor.

There’s no real harm in waiting, of course, other than having to go through a second procedure later on. It can be done fairly easily under local anesthesia. In rare cases, when we feel that someone is very borderline in terms of need for nostril narrowing, we’ll wait. We almost always find later on that indeed it was not necessary. But, our overriding philosophy is that we want our patients’ first rhinoplasty with us to also be the last time they need anything done for their noses. So, when alar base reduction would be beneficial, we want to take care of it at the same time.

We often see ethnic patients wanting a more defined nose. Many ethnic noses tend to have thicker skin. Achieving the definition, narrowing, and refinement you desire has everything to do with how that thick skin wraps around the cartilage structure underneath. If the cartilage structure is well-defined and well-supported, you can achieve excellent definition. If the cartilage lacks shape, your tip will look the same- bulbous, wide, full, and lacking in shape. On top of that, ethnic patients often have a thicker layer of tissue under the skin that lays on top of the tip cartilage. In these cases, it is necessary to carefully ‘thin out’ the thicker pad of tissue under your skin so that the newly-defined cartilage can show through.

Ethnic rhinoplasty depends more on cartilage grafting (using your own cartilage to create definition where it is lacking) than does traditional rhinoplasty. So, you should see a rhinoplasty expert who has experience in ethnic rhinoplasty to ensure your chances at a great result. We have found that a combination of tip cartilage suturing/grafting and soft tissue thinning, along with augmentation of your bridge and nostril narrowing, if required, can produce a beautiful and natural result. You’ll see some examples of the results you can achieve on our website.

The photo above gives you a peek inside at the anatomy of a boxy tip. For many years, the standard technique for tip narrowing was thinning of the upper edge of the tip cartilages, what we call a cephalic trim or cephalic margin resection shown below. When an excessively wide and thick tip cartilage is contributing to a boxy tip, this maneuver is helpful, but it’s very important that the surgeon doesn’t do so much thinning that the tip cartilages are destabilized.

The diagram below shows a reasonable amount of cartilage thinning (shown in red) that will preserve structural integrity and prevent collapse over time. This is especially important in thicker-skinned patients where stronger cartilage is necessary to support the thicker skin. Sadly, we continue to see potential revision patients every day where most or all of the tip cartilage was removed in this area resulting in predictable collapse over time.

Suture techniques for tip narrowing and refinement

 You can see from the above real patient photos that these techniques can produce a dramatic improvement. We need to be careful to preserve just the right angle between these cartilages so that light will reflect favorably on your new tip. An inexperienced or careless surgeon may draw the cartilages too close together or may introduce asymmetries that show up later on, or he may not account for skin thickness and other factors. But, in the right hands, suture techniques provide a powerful way to safely provide the refinement and narrowing you are looking for without compromising breathing. In a future post, we’ll show you how we address tips that are too overprojected.

Many of our African American patients who present for rhinoplasty feel that their nose is too wide, “too big,” and undefined for their face. So you can imagine many of them become confused when we explain that they need to have augmentation rhinoplasty in order to make their nose look smaller.

While we recognize that there is tremendous variability in every parameter of the African American noses: including nostril shape and flare, nasal length, skin thickness, columella length, nasal projection, and bridge height; numerous studies have shown that African American patients, on average, tend to have:

1.      Weak, Short Tip Cartilages- results in tip looking short and droopy

2.      Wider, Bulbous Nasal Tips

3.      Wider Variability in Nostril Shape

4.      Greater Nostril Flare (bigger nostril curvature)- makes tip look wide

5.      Acute Nasolabial Angle- again can make tip look droopy

6.      Thin, Weak Septal Cartilage- harder to support and refine nose

7.      Wider, Lower Nasal Bridges- makes nose look wide and washed out

8.      Thicker Skin- makes it more difficult to add tip definition and refinement

9.      Excess Tissue in the Nasal Tip- resulting in poor tip definition

With all of this being said, over the years we have found that the most challenging part in African American rhinoplasty is correcting the deficiency in tip projection in the face of a bulbous, amorphic tip with thick skin.  In other words, the nose is at once short and wide.

As a result, in this type of nose it is important to build up and add to the tip structure in order to not only provide adequate support but also to give lasting tip definition and refinement. And at the same tip we must recognize that most of our patients are seeking a thinner, more refined nasal tip that is not built up too much. So as you can see in our example below a balance must be created between appropriate refinement without excessive projection.

This professional African American presented after noticing that over time his nose had started to droop and widen. You will note that even 3 months after surgery the improvement in tip definition and refinement is significant.

How about neither? We are often asked about nasal implants. These are primarily used for East Asians, African Americans, and others seeking a stronger, higher nasal bridge and a more refined tip. They are also sometimes recommended for patients whose bridge has been lowered too much during previous surgery. Implants can be of various materials but the most commonly used implants are made of silicone/silastic.

Above you can see the typical shape of a nasal L-strut implant. This particular one happens to made of Medpor which can be a real problem to revise…but that’s another story.

We were recently asked about revision of an L-shaped implant that gave this particular patient’s nose a pointy, unnatural appearance. She had been happy with her natural tip but the surgeon recommended an L-strut anyways. Now, she didn’t like the look and was also starting to notice some redness of her tip 3 months after her surgery.

Let us say first off that we’re not big fans. We much prefer your own cartilage for augmenting or rebuilding the nose, whether it is from the septum, ear, or rib, or even sometimes irradiated rib.

The concerns mentioned can sometimes arise after use of a nasal implant, and that’s part of the reason we’re not big fans. An L-strut lays over the entire bridge and extends down under the tip to the base of the columella. It gives the tip definition by placing a fair bit of pressure over a small area of skin to tent the skin out. It cannot reproduce or retain the natural shape of your tip. As a result, it can look a little too pointy and unnatural.Sometimes, this pressure on the skin can become too much for the skin to bear. If you are noticing redness at your tip after an implant, you should see your surgeon or another rhinoplasty expert early to determine the cause. If the skin is under too much tension, this would be a good reason to intervene early with a revision procedure to avoid injury to the skin.

The other problem with an L-shaped implant is the possibility that it will twist or move over time and cause your nasal contour to appear crooked. These problems are less likely with an I-shaped implant that stops just above your tip because the forces of healing and skin contraction do not act on it in the same way. An I-shaped implant really justs rests on your bridge without providing the same type of structural support that an L-shaped implant is intended to give. Still, an I-shaped implant can look bulky, blocky, and unnatural. Your own natural nose is not one continuous block of cartilage…so a long, bulky, continuous implant does not make sense to us. We should replace your own lost or deficient tissues with similar tissues.

Our preference for ethnic augmentation rhinoplasty is to use your own cartilage for augmentation. If you are happy with your natural tip, you should be able to keep that roundness. Augmentation of your bridge can be done by itself to balance with your tip and other features. If you continue to be unsatisfied with a nasal implant, rest assured that you can achieve a refined but natural nose.

Every so often we are confronted by the patient who has gone overseas to have surgery only to return with a botched result. Now this is not to say that surgeons outside the US are not good or as accomplished but simply that once you have surgery overseas your ability to have adeuate follow up or in the worst case scenario recourse toward revision are dramatically decreased.

While most people go abroad thinking they can have surgery done cheaper in some exotic location, the problem is you really cannot be sure what you will get in terms of surgeon or facility once you get there. The truth is that facilities in the US are held to a standard that is not matched by many of the destination countries people look to when thinking about surgery abroad. Moreover, in case of an infection or other complication, there is little patients can do since they usually have not planned to stay more than the few days they thought would be necessary. And all this is not too mention the problems of a long flight after long surgery which can result in a blod clot or more serious problems.

This problem becomes especially important to us because rhinoplasty is more complex than some other procedures and the potential for long term poor outcomes is much higher. We address this because whether your Asian and considering augmentation rhinoplasty or if you are Persian and think that you can have surgery done in Iran, the decision on who to have do your surgery should not be based on cost.

That being said, we are not saying that the most expensive is the best, we know that that is not true either. Rather we advocate for choosing a doctor who you can speak to, whose results you can see, and who takes the time to understand what you want to achieve. If you go abroad, this may be difficult if you and the doctor don’t speak the same language.

We were recently asked if rhinoplasty is customized to each person because this individual liked her longer nose but wanted a smaller tip and a less droopy appearance. Rhinoplasty absolutely is and should always be individualized to your features, skin type, and specific goals and desires for your nose!

In the old days, the short, upturned, ‘cutesy’ nose was the only way a rhinoplasty was done. Sadly, this is sometimes still the case today, but those days should really be gone. We like to say that the object of a successful rhinoplasty should be to give you the nose you were meant to be born with. It is not meant to radically change the way you look. The results should look totally natural and completely in balance with your other features.

When done properly, your nose should blend into the background and no longer be a focus of attention. When done poorly, a rhinoplasty can really change your look in a way you may not have wanted, so you are absolutely right to explore these questions. Check out our previous blog on the topic for more info. Your rhinoplasty should be tailored individually to your features and goals, and should never rob you of your character.

If you find yourself having similar mixed feelings about your nose, there is nothing wrong with asking your surgeon to preserve certain aspects of your nose while changing others. You should recognize that every aspect of your nose is tied in to every other aspect so a change in one part will have a certain effect on the whole. But, in most cases, your goals and desires will turn out to be very reasonable and achievable in the hands of a rhinoplasty specialist.

If you have a longer and narrower face to match your longer nose, you may decide to keep the length; it will look good on you and give a sophisticated, elegant look. Your surgeon should be able to help you tease out what can be accomplished using computer imaging. Remember, this is an operation of millimeters. It is not and should not be an all-or-nothing procedure.

Indications for Tip Grafts in Revision Rhinoplasty

In the revision rhinoplasty patient tip grafts may be necessary if: (1) there is a pollybeak deformity (2) there is an asymmetric tip or nasal bossae (3) there is a poorly defined nasal tip (4) in the overly shortened nose, or (5) there was failure to recognize false tip projection at the time of primary surgery or there was loss of normal tip support mechanisms after primary rhinoplasty. We will explore each of these situations in turn and post representative examples in future blogs.

Underprojected Nasal Tip and Pollybeak Deformity

Perhaps the most commonly utilized purpose for the tip graft in our practice continues to be the one for which it was originally devised. In his exploration of his 30 year experience with tip grafts, Sheen noted that poor tip projection and supratip deformity are very commonly seen in post- rhinoplasty patients. For a long time the principle cause of this supratip deformity was thought to be excessive skeletal tissue in the supratip region. As a result, surgeons used to routinely revise pollybeak deformities by removing even more tissue in the supratip region with a resultant exacerbation of the problem. Sheen’s proposal that the vast majority of these pollybeak deformities were the result of overzealous resection of the nasal dorsum is widely accepted today, and it is thought that the supratip deformity arises as a result of scar tissue deposition which naturally occurs in order to eliminate the dead space produced by overresection.

The factors to consider in patients with postoperative supratip convexities include:

• overresection of the caudal nasal dorsum with scar tissue deposition,
• insufficient removal of the dorsal cartilaginous septum,
• inadequate resection of the cephalic portion of the lower lateral crura (LLC),
• and inadequate tip projection.

Moreover, sometimes the surgeon focusing on a large dorsal hump or supratip deformity misses the concomitant underprojected nasal tip. It is therefore critical in correcting pollybeak deformity for the surgeon to make the aesthetic decision as to whether there is adequate tip projection. All too often patients are still misdiagnosed and consequently undergo the inappropriate treatment. Excessive attention to the dorsal hump results in overreduction of the dorsum with resultant long term resultant pollybeak deformity as the skin soft tissue envelope is unable to contract to the newly reduced skeletal framework.

To make this determination we evaluate certain characteristics which can serve as signs for underprojected nasal tip: shortened columella, acute nasolabial angle, maxillary retrusion, and small, weak alar cartilages. The use of tip grafts, particularly in revision surgery, for the treatment of supratip deformity often is the only means of correction available. Suture techniques, such as the lateral crural steal, which increase projection in patients, are often simply not sufficient to project the tip to the desired level. These patients have often undergone overresection of the alar cartilages and have resultant weakened tip support. In addressing these patients tip grafts provide the needed cartilaginous skeletal framework needed to support the weakened alar cartilages.

Overresected Nasal Tip

When the nasal tip has been overly resected, in revision surgery we are often faced with excessive tip narrowing, bossae formation, asymmetric and occasionally external valve collapse. In the over- resected nasal tip, bossae are generally thought to result from the dynamic forces of scar contracture. In general terms, the surgical maneuvers that contribute to bossae formation are those that fail to secure symmetric dome cartilages, those that promote separation of the domes, and those that weaken the cephalic margin of the LLCs. While it would be nice if all surgeons prevented bossae by reconstituting the domes, reinforcing weak cartilage and avoiding sharp edges, nasal tip bossae continue to constitute one of the major causes of revision rhinoplasty for our practice.

In those patients with an asymmetric nasal tip, the asymmetry is often the result of unequal LLC removal or distorting forces on the medial or lateral crura that twist the tip. If adequate tip projection and tip strength are present, correction requires separation of the medial and lateral components followed by repositioning and trimming. Very commonly, unfortunately, overresection has occurred concomitantly and necessitates grafting in order to camouflage and support. In some of our revision cases the tip graft is often the only means of correction when overresection of the ala has resulted in bossae formation, excessive tip narrowing, asymmetry, or external valve collapse.

Poor Tip Definition

Poor tip definition continues to represent the most difficult challenge for the rhinoplasty surgeon operating on ethnic rhinoplasty patients. While wide variability exists in the ethnic patient population as a whole, generalizations can be made which can be used as a guide when planning rhinoplasty in this patient population. Specifically, when compared to the Caucasian standard, numerous studies have shown that African American and Hispanic patients tend to have combinations of:

Thick, sebaceous, relatively inelastic skin
Weak lower lateral cartilages
Wide bulbous tip
Excess fibrofatty tissue in the nasal tip
Acute nasolabial angle
Short medial crura
Thin weak septal cartilage

In this type of nose it is important to implement structured augmentation in order to not only provide adequate support but also to give meaningful definition and refinement.The shield graft is useful in ethnic patients when additional tip defining techniques are needed because the standard suturing tip procedures often do not give an entirely satisfactory result. Over the years we have found that the most challenging assignment in ethnic rhinoplasty is correcting the deficiency in tip projection in the face of a bulbous, amorphic tip with thick skin.  In particular, as many of these patients prefer thinner, more refined nasal tips it is important not to build up too much. As a result a balance must be delineated between appropriate refinement without excessive projection.

Overshortened Nose

The aesthetically short nose appears when excessive upward tilt of the nasal tip results in a foreshortened appearance. In the revision patient, the overshortened nose generally occurs after excessive shortening of the caudal septum. Over time, the result is an increased nasolabial angle with increased nostril show. When we are faced with these challenging patients, correction generally entails the use of a caudal septal graft in order to lengthen the nose as well as a tip graft to restructure and reproject the tip.

False Tip Projection or Loss of Tip Support Mechanisms

Many routine techniques in rhinoplasty result in false tip projection at the time of surgery or result in loss of tip projection in the long term. If the primary surgeon is cognizant of these considerations at the primary setting, the revision surgeon would not find indication for the need of increased projection. Unfortunately, while occasionally these patients can have correction with more conservative techniques such as the lateral crural steal, we have found occasion for the use of tip grafts in these patients in order to achieve adequate projection.

Moreover, many surgeons continue to find that an initially satisfactory result ultimately becomes an underprojected tip with the illusion of supratip deformity. The reason is often secondary to the utilization of techniques that weaken major and or minor tip support mechanisms which then in time result in loss of projection. Specifically, the cartilage splitting, cartilage delivery techniques and cephalic trimming of LLCs all result in disruption of the major supportive attachment of the ULCs to the LLCs in the scroll area. Full transfixion incisions interrupt the attachments between the LLC and the anterior septal angle and, if carried low enough, will disrupt the attachment of the medial crus feet to the posterior septal angle. And lowering the cartilaginous dorsum and shortening the caudal septum contribute to loss of minor tip support mechanisms. Finally, it is imperative for the surgeon in the primary setting to consider operative tip swelling secondary to infiltration of local anesthetics, the edema of surgical trauma, and repeated stretching of the nostrils with the nasal speculum. The increased tip projection  is transient and it subsides early in the healing phase as the extra interstitial fluids are mobilized back into the intravascular space.

Facial Plastic Surgeons should be more interested in ethnic rhinoplasty because the number of interested African Americans, East Asians, and Hispanics is rising dramatically! It still represents a minority of most rhinoplasty practices, though. Ethnic rhinoplasty requires a totally different view of aesthetics, principles, and tools to achieve appropriate augmentation and definition. A dramatic change in a profile pic after shaving down a big bump is probably the easiest thing to do in rhinoplasty. So, you see surgeons’ websites full of these examples. (Hint: look for a surgeon who shows you the other views too…the front view and three quarter views are often the most important because that is how the world sees you). The differences in skin thickness, cartilage consistency, and other factors in ethnic patients can often mean that it is harder to achieve a dramatic change. Most ethnic patients have a tendency towards thicker skin combined with softer, less distinct cartilage. A lot more grafting is required than in a typical primary reduction rhinoplasty that makes a nose smaller. But, if you see a rhinoplasty specialist, the type of pleasing, balanced result you are looking for should be achievable. You just might have to dig a little deeper to find a surgeon with lots of experience in Augmentation Rhinoplasty.