When you’re thinking about a nose job, you either don’t care how it’s done… you just want to make sure your surgeon can deliver the result you want and that’s it. Final. Over. Period. Or, you may join a growing group of people who want to research the procedure in detail to learn the pluses and minuses of open vs. closed rhinoplasty or Technique A vs. Technique B. If that sounds familiar, this blog is for you.

Most people have a hard time understanding nasal tip surgery. Taking down a bump on the bridge is easy to understand. A little shave here or there…it makes sense. But, it’s harder to wrap your head around how we make your tip smaller without removing a lot of cartilage and having it fall in over time.

Many plastic surgeons aren’t even comfortable working on your tip. For example, tip deprojection or bringing your tip closer to your face, is one of the harder things to do in rhinoplasty. Many plastic surgeons tend to avoid significant changes to the tip in favor of making the nose smaller by concentrating on that bump on the bridge (sometimes a little too much). So, one of the most common reasons both men and women want a revision nose job is that they think their tip is still too big.

So how do we do it? We use highly controlled procedures. One of our favorite techniques involves dividing the tip cartilage, overlapping the edges by a measured amount, and suturing it back together in a way that is stronger than it was at first (shown below). We can measure exactly how much we want your tip to move. And, depending on where along the cartilage we divide it, we can also change the angle your tip makes with your upper lip and correct any tip asymmetries without having to worry about it changing over time. 

So, whether you’re considering your first nose job or a revision, you should know that these tools, if done right, can be a really powerful and predictable way to give you the smaller, refined tip you want like the one you see below. For more before and after photos of our rhinoplasty and revision rhinoplasty results, check out our rhinoplasty gallery.

The photo above gives you a peek inside at the anatomy of a boxy tip. For many years, the standard technique for tip narrowing was thinning of the upper edge of the tip cartilages, what we call a cephalic trim or cephalic margin resection shown below. When an excessively wide and thick tip cartilage is contributing to a boxy tip, this maneuver is helpful, but it’s very important that the surgeon doesn’t do so much thinning that the tip cartilages are destabilized.

The diagram below shows a reasonable amount of cartilage thinning (shown in red) that will preserve structural integrity and prevent collapse over time. This is especially important in thicker-skinned patients where stronger cartilage is necessary to support the thicker skin. Sadly, we continue to see potential revision patients every day where most or all of the tip cartilage was removed in this area resulting in predictable collapse over time.

Suture techniques for tip narrowing and refinement

 You can see from the above real patient photos that these techniques can produce a dramatic improvement. We need to be careful to preserve just the right angle between these cartilages so that light will reflect favorably on your new tip. An inexperienced or careless surgeon may draw the cartilages too close together or may introduce asymmetries that show up later on, or he may not account for skin thickness and other factors. But, in the right hands, suture techniques provide a powerful way to safely provide the refinement and narrowing you are looking for without compromising breathing. In a future post, we’ll show you how we address tips that are too overprojected.

This is a big question for people. There is a lot of fear about the open rhinoplasty incision. Will it be noticeable? Maybe you’ve seen examples of poor scars from an open rhinoplasty. The fact is poor scars happen when poor technique is used.

You should know that, in the hands of a careful and experienced open rhinoplasty surgeon, the open incision heals beautifully. Below is a typical example of how one of our open rhinoplasties looks before and after just 3 months. We hope you’ll agree that without showing you where the incision is placed in red, you’d have a pretty hard time finding it.

One or more of these incisions is made depending on how much work is planned for the tip. The incision on the far right also needs to be made if the septum is addressed as well. In contrast, work on the tip, bridge, and septum can all be accomplished in open rhinoplasty through the same external incision.

It’s not as important to understand the different incisions as it is to understand that the internal incisions made in closed rhinoplasty often pose real healing problems too. Some of these incisions are made near the narrowest part of your nasal airway so just a little bit of excess scar tissue can seriously compromise your breathing and potentially destabilize your tip.

Every surgical technique has advantages as well as potential downsides and trade-offs to consider. Don’t get too hung up on whether your preferred surgeon suggests an open or closed rhinoplasty for your nose. We like to say that far more important than how the surgeon opens, is what he does to the underlying structure once he’s there- that’s what in the long term gives you the beautiful, stable results we are all looking for. So, while we use both approaches, far more often than not we find that an open rhinoplasty is what it will take to achieve just the right change for you.

An interesting question that came up on the RealSelf forum had to do with radix grafts. A radix graft is a (usually) small piece of cartilage placed at the root of your nose between your eyes. It’s meant to add height to this area and is potentially used for several reasons.

We don’t often use radix grafts but may do so when someone’s bridge has been taken down too much in this area during prior surgery. In some patients, the root of the nose starts very low giving the appearance of an exaggerated bump on the bridge or an overly shortened appearance to the nose. Because the nasal root is so deeply-set, the angle between the nose and the forehead is exaggerated.

In these cases, a radix graft can be appropriate as a better alternative to taking down the bump so much that it brings the bridge too low or shortens the nose too much. A radix graft can preserve or augment nasal length by giving the nose the appearance of ‘taking off’ a little higher from the forehead.

The particular question today had to do with the effect of a radix graft on the appearance of the eyes. This person had closely-set eyes to begin with and was afraid that a radix graft might worsen that appearance. It is true that a washed out nasal bridge can give the sense that your eyes are farther apart. Conversely, adding height to the bridge can theoretically give the sense that eyes are drawn closer together.

But (and this a big but here), if you are considering this question, you must think about where you are coming from. If your bridge was taken down too low during a previous surgery and you are considering adding back some natural height and length to balance your nose, then the impact of a radix graft on the appearance of your eye width will be minimal.

On the other hand, improving a washed out appearance of your bridge would have the effect of creating more nasal narrowing and refinement from the frontal view. And, this is hopefully what you’re trying to accomplish. So, while we consider any graft carefully before recommending it, a radix graft is sometimes just the right fit for the problem at hand. For more information about nasal aesthetics, check out our online rhinoplasty textbook.

How about neither? We are often asked about nasal implants. These are primarily used for East Asians, African Americans, and others seeking a stronger, higher nasal bridge and a more refined tip. They are also sometimes recommended for patients whose bridge has been lowered too much during previous surgery. Implants can be of various materials but the most commonly used implants are made of silicone/silastic.

Above you can see the typical shape of a nasal L-strut implant. This particular one happens to made of Medpor which can be a real problem to revise…but that’s another story.

We were recently asked about revision of an L-shaped implant that gave this particular patient’s nose a pointy, unnatural appearance. She had been happy with her natural tip but the surgeon recommended an L-strut anyways. Now, she didn’t like the look and was also starting to notice some redness of her tip 3 months after her surgery.

Let us say first off that we’re not big fans. We much prefer your own cartilage for augmenting or rebuilding the nose, whether it is from the septum, ear, or rib, or even sometimes irradiated rib.

The concerns mentioned can sometimes arise after use of a nasal implant, and that’s part of the reason we’re not big fans. An L-strut lays over the entire bridge and extends down under the tip to the base of the columella. It gives the tip definition by placing a fair bit of pressure over a small area of skin to tent the skin out. It cannot reproduce or retain the natural shape of your tip. As a result, it can look a little too pointy and unnatural.Sometimes, this pressure on the skin can become too much for the skin to bear. If you are noticing redness at your tip after an implant, you should see your surgeon or another rhinoplasty expert early to determine the cause. If the skin is under too much tension, this would be a good reason to intervene early with a revision procedure to avoid injury to the skin.

The other problem with an L-shaped implant is the possibility that it will twist or move over time and cause your nasal contour to appear crooked. These problems are less likely with an I-shaped implant that stops just above your tip because the forces of healing and skin contraction do not act on it in the same way. An I-shaped implant really justs rests on your bridge without providing the same type of structural support that an L-shaped implant is intended to give. Still, an I-shaped implant can look bulky, blocky, and unnatural. Your own natural nose is not one continuous block of cartilage…so a long, bulky, continuous implant does not make sense to us. We should replace your own lost or deficient tissues with similar tissues.

Our preference for ethnic augmentation rhinoplasty is to use your own cartilage for augmentation. If you are happy with your natural tip, you should be able to keep that roundness. Augmentation of your bridge can be done by itself to balance with your tip and other features. If you continue to be unsatisfied with a nasal implant, rest assured that you can achieve a refined but natural nose.

Here is another one from the Q&A file that can be a source of concern for people soon after a rhinoplasty. We were recently asked about vertical lines/shadows showing up after rhinoplasty on either side of the bridge. What was more worrisome for this person was the fact that she was able to feel small gaps when she pressed on the area.

The lines you may feel at the sides of the bridge are most likely fracture lines in the bones that were created to narrow or straighten them. If your bones were wide or crooked, then the surgeon must create these cuts in the bones in order to manipulate them to the desired shape.

If there was a lot of narrowing accomplished, you can sometimes feel a little gap in this area which can be perceived as a small ’step-off’ in appearance.

Don’t worry too much, though. If this is noticeable at all (and most people will not notice this), it will not last long. The bones will heal and the apparent gap should diminish in most situations. This rarely ever becomes a long-term problem, and usually only when the bony cuts were made too high near the bridge. If you are having a similar concern, you have reason to be reassured.

As is often the case, it really is not possible to tell you for sure if septoplasty alone can straighten your twisted nasal tip; but we can tell you that in our own experience we’ve had a few cases where simply correcting the septum did straighten the tip.

While it is relatively rare, and in our experience only occurred in a few patients, we have had patients who had a septal fracture in the front part of the septum which resulted in a twisted nasal tip. In general these are not simple septum repairs that can be corrected via a routine septoplasty, but rather need to be approached through an open approach- which is the approach we use for rhinoplasty in many cases anyways.

If there is an anterior septal fracture, this approach will allow us to address the nasal tip even if the septoplasty alone does not completely straighten the tip- this can occur due to scarring or memory in the tip cartilages that would keep the tip twisted even after the septum is straightened.

However, all this being said we find that in general most of our patients have needed a rhinoplasty that focused on the tip in order to genuinely get a straight nasal tip. Each particular case has to be analyzed individually to determine if septoplasty alone will help in making the tip straighter, but ultimately until we operate and see what happens and what if any scar tissue is present we leave our options open so that we do not leave the OR until your tip is straightened.

Indications for Tip Grafts in Revision Rhinoplasty

In the revision rhinoplasty patient tip grafts may be necessary if: (1) there is a pollybeak deformity (2) there is an asymmetric tip or nasal bossae (3) there is a poorly defined nasal tip (4) in the overly shortened nose, or (5) there was failure to recognize false tip projection at the time of primary surgery or there was loss of normal tip support mechanisms after primary rhinoplasty. We will explore each of these situations in turn and post representative examples in future blogs.

Underprojected Nasal Tip and Pollybeak Deformity

Perhaps the most commonly utilized purpose for the tip graft in our practice continues to be the one for which it was originally devised. In his exploration of his 30 year experience with tip grafts, Sheen noted that poor tip projection and supratip deformity are very commonly seen in post- rhinoplasty patients. For a long time the principle cause of this supratip deformity was thought to be excessive skeletal tissue in the supratip region. As a result, surgeons used to routinely revise pollybeak deformities by removing even more tissue in the supratip region with a resultant exacerbation of the problem. Sheen’s proposal that the vast majority of these pollybeak deformities were the result of overzealous resection of the nasal dorsum is widely accepted today, and it is thought that the supratip deformity arises as a result of scar tissue deposition which naturally occurs in order to eliminate the dead space produced by overresection.

The factors to consider in patients with postoperative supratip convexities include:

• overresection of the caudal nasal dorsum with scar tissue deposition,
• insufficient removal of the dorsal cartilaginous septum,
• inadequate resection of the cephalic portion of the lower lateral crura (LLC),
• and inadequate tip projection.

Moreover, sometimes the surgeon focusing on a large dorsal hump or supratip deformity misses the concomitant underprojected nasal tip. It is therefore critical in correcting pollybeak deformity for the surgeon to make the aesthetic decision as to whether there is adequate tip projection. All too often patients are still misdiagnosed and consequently undergo the inappropriate treatment. Excessive attention to the dorsal hump results in overreduction of the dorsum with resultant long term resultant pollybeak deformity as the skin soft tissue envelope is unable to contract to the newly reduced skeletal framework.

To make this determination we evaluate certain characteristics which can serve as signs for underprojected nasal tip: shortened columella, acute nasolabial angle, maxillary retrusion, and small, weak alar cartilages. The use of tip grafts, particularly in revision surgery, for the treatment of supratip deformity often is the only means of correction available. Suture techniques, such as the lateral crural steal, which increase projection in patients, are often simply not sufficient to project the tip to the desired level. These patients have often undergone overresection of the alar cartilages and have resultant weakened tip support. In addressing these patients tip grafts provide the needed cartilaginous skeletal framework needed to support the weakened alar cartilages.

Overresected Nasal Tip

When the nasal tip has been overly resected, in revision surgery we are often faced with excessive tip narrowing, bossae formation, asymmetric and occasionally external valve collapse. In the over- resected nasal tip, bossae are generally thought to result from the dynamic forces of scar contracture. In general terms, the surgical maneuvers that contribute to bossae formation are those that fail to secure symmetric dome cartilages, those that promote separation of the domes, and those that weaken the cephalic margin of the LLCs. While it would be nice if all surgeons prevented bossae by reconstituting the domes, reinforcing weak cartilage and avoiding sharp edges, nasal tip bossae continue to constitute one of the major causes of revision rhinoplasty for our practice.

In those patients with an asymmetric nasal tip, the asymmetry is often the result of unequal LLC removal or distorting forces on the medial or lateral crura that twist the tip. If adequate tip projection and tip strength are present, correction requires separation of the medial and lateral components followed by repositioning and trimming. Very commonly, unfortunately, overresection has occurred concomitantly and necessitates grafting in order to camouflage and support. In some of our revision cases the tip graft is often the only means of correction when overresection of the ala has resulted in bossae formation, excessive tip narrowing, asymmetry, or external valve collapse.

Poor Tip Definition

Poor tip definition continues to represent the most difficult challenge for the rhinoplasty surgeon operating on ethnic rhinoplasty patients. While wide variability exists in the ethnic patient population as a whole, generalizations can be made which can be used as a guide when planning rhinoplasty in this patient population. Specifically, when compared to the Caucasian standard, numerous studies have shown that African American and Hispanic patients tend to have combinations of:

Thick, sebaceous, relatively inelastic skin
Weak lower lateral cartilages
Wide bulbous tip
Excess fibrofatty tissue in the nasal tip
Acute nasolabial angle
Short medial crura
Thin weak septal cartilage

In this type of nose it is important to implement structured augmentation in order to not only provide adequate support but also to give meaningful definition and refinement.The shield graft is useful in ethnic patients when additional tip defining techniques are needed because the standard suturing tip procedures often do not give an entirely satisfactory result. Over the years we have found that the most challenging assignment in ethnic rhinoplasty is correcting the deficiency in tip projection in the face of a bulbous, amorphic tip with thick skin.  In particular, as many of these patients prefer thinner, more refined nasal tips it is important not to build up too much. As a result a balance must be delineated between appropriate refinement without excessive projection.

Overshortened Nose

The aesthetically short nose appears when excessive upward tilt of the nasal tip results in a foreshortened appearance. In the revision patient, the overshortened nose generally occurs after excessive shortening of the caudal septum. Over time, the result is an increased nasolabial angle with increased nostril show. When we are faced with these challenging patients, correction generally entails the use of a caudal septal graft in order to lengthen the nose as well as a tip graft to restructure and reproject the tip.

False Tip Projection or Loss of Tip Support Mechanisms

Many routine techniques in rhinoplasty result in false tip projection at the time of surgery or result in loss of tip projection in the long term. If the primary surgeon is cognizant of these considerations at the primary setting, the revision surgeon would not find indication for the need of increased projection. Unfortunately, while occasionally these patients can have correction with more conservative techniques such as the lateral crural steal, we have found occasion for the use of tip grafts in these patients in order to achieve adequate projection.

Moreover, many surgeons continue to find that an initially satisfactory result ultimately becomes an underprojected tip with the illusion of supratip deformity. The reason is often secondary to the utilization of techniques that weaken major and or minor tip support mechanisms which then in time result in loss of projection. Specifically, the cartilage splitting, cartilage delivery techniques and cephalic trimming of LLCs all result in disruption of the major supportive attachment of the ULCs to the LLCs in the scroll area. Full transfixion incisions interrupt the attachments between the LLC and the anterior septal angle and, if carried low enough, will disrupt the attachment of the medial crus feet to the posterior septal angle. And lowering the cartilaginous dorsum and shortening the caudal septum contribute to loss of minor tip support mechanisms. Finally, it is imperative for the surgeon in the primary setting to consider operative tip swelling secondary to infiltration of local anesthetics, the edema of surgical trauma, and repeated stretching of the nostrils with the nasal speculum. The increased tip projection  is transient and it subsides early in the healing phase as the extra interstitial fluids are mobilized back into the intravascular space.

We have been getting numerous questions lately about whether it’s possible to fix an overshortened nose. A large part of our practice is helping people who previously went in for rhinoplasty with a plastic surgeon to fix a specific complaint and did not get what they were hoping for. Of all of these unhappy people, those with over-rotated noses (turned up too much) or over-shortened noses are some of the unhappiest. This is a harder problem to fix but it can most definitely be accomplished.

So how does this result happen in the first place? Well, it has everything to do with the techniques that are used to reduce a long or projected nose. Take a look at the images below to get a picture of normal nose anatomy.

In the top image, you can see the normal bony and cartilage anatomy of the nose in profile. The picture on the bottom shows the anatomy of the septum inside your nose in relation to the external anatomy. The septum, shown in white, makes up the foundation for the middle part of your nose (the upper lateral cartilages) and, to some extent, your tip as well. It is a large block of cartilage and bone that sits on the upper jaw and provides some nasal stability. The bone to which it attaches along the floor of your nose is called the maxillary crest, and the very front of this bone is a projection called the nasal spine, shown in blue. You can normally feel this as a hard piece of bone at the base of your columella. These are important structures that we’ll tell you about next.

So how is it that some rhinoplasties have such problematic outcomes? Many surgeons, shorten a long nose by removing the nasal spine and the front part of the septum. See the image below for details.

On the other hand, when we want to shorten a nose or rotate the tip, we focus on altering the shape of the tip cartilages themselves to create the contour we want. In this way we are able to provide a predictable result that does not weaken your nose (if anything, it makes it stronger).

Seen above are the cutting methods used by many surgeons to shorten a long nose. This is a bit like shortening a building by knocking out the foundation. The structure sinks, and not in a good way. When the nasal spine or septum are shortened many patients have an acceptable result for the first year, but they are highly unpredictable and often do not last the test of time. They depend on scar tissue build-up to determine the movement and the ultimate shape of your nose. When the foundation is removed, your tip might fall forwards and droop or it might fall backwards and look too short and upturned but, either way, there is a good chance it will collapse and lose refinement over several years.

Why do some surgeons do this?? That’s a good question that we don’t know the answer to. However, most likely, it’s because cutting is quicker and easier than the methods of reshaping the nose and tip to achieve lasting predictable deprojection and rotation. These more reliable techniques are also more difficult to perform, especially through a closed approach. And, since many of the problems that arise from these cutting techniques may not be seen for several years after rhinoplasty, many surgeons may not even realize their patients are having these problems.

So, how do we fix this problem? These revisions are often complicated by virtue of the scar tissue that must be removed to gain the needed length. We then have to restore the cartilage that was lost using grafts known as septal extension grafts and/or extended spreader grafts. Sometimes, a tip graft is used to achieve added length and projection. The good news is that a balanced profile can be achieved, the nose can be lengthened and you can be made happy again.

Above is a Before and After Rhinoplasty photo of a patient who had revision rhinoplasty surgery at Profiles Beverly Hills by Los Angeles Rhinoplasty Surgeons Drs. Peyman Solieman and Dr. Jason Litner. Note the overshortened, overrotated, undefined, and scooped appearance on the left and the restoration of an harmonious and natural profile after surgery. For more information on other rhinoplasty mistakes, visit our dedicated rhinoplasty site.

Facial Plastic Surgeons should be more interested in ethnic rhinoplasty because the number of interested African Americans, East Asians, and Hispanics is rising dramatically! It still represents a minority of most rhinoplasty practices, though. Ethnic rhinoplasty requires a totally different view of aesthetics, principles, and tools to achieve appropriate augmentation and definition. A dramatic change in a profile pic after shaving down a big bump is probably the easiest thing to do in rhinoplasty. So, you see surgeons’ websites full of these examples. (Hint: look for a surgeon who shows you the other views too…the front view and three quarter views are often the most important because that is how the world sees you). The differences in skin thickness, cartilage consistency, and other factors in ethnic patients can often mean that it is harder to achieve a dramatic change. Most ethnic patients have a tendency towards thicker skin combined with softer, less distinct cartilage. A lot more grafting is required than in a typical primary reduction rhinoplasty that makes a nose smaller. But, if you see a rhinoplasty specialist, the type of pleasing, balanced result you are looking for should be achievable. You just might have to dig a little deeper to find a surgeon with lots of experience in Augmentation Rhinoplasty.