<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why New Botox Tax is Just a Tax on Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rhinoplastyinbeverlyhills.com/why-new-botox-tax-is-just-a-tax-on-women/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rhinoplastyinbeverlyhills.com/why-new-botox-tax-is-just-a-tax-on-women</link>
	<description>Expert Advice from Beverly Hills Rhinoplasty Surgery Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:14:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael C. Pickart, M.D., F.A.C.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.rhinoplastyinbeverlyhills.com/why-new-botox-tax-is-just-a-tax-on-women/comment-page-1#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael C. Pickart, M.D., F.A.C.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhinoplastyinbeverlyhills.com/?p=807#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your arguments.  You both are right on!  To highlight how difficult it will be to institute this &quot;Bo-Tax,&quot; here are a few examples from my own practice from the past week:

* 55-year-old woman receives Botox in her forehead for &quot;vanity&quot; (her own admission).  Neverthelss, her migraines disappear!  Was the Botox cosmetic?  Should she be taxed 5%?  Certainly, her very costly anti-migraine medications won&#039;t be taxed 5%, so why should Botox?

* 27-year-old woman with very large breasts, which cause neck, back, and shoulder pain.  Her insurance company refused to cover the procedure, even though cosmesis was a secondary concern.  Post-operatively, her pain has resolved, and her insurance company no longer has to pay for physical therapy.  Does she pay the 5%?  Certainly, her breasts are now cuter, but was this a cosmetic surgery or a reconstructive surgery?

The Bo-Tax is too simplistic.  It ignores the &quot;gray&quot; in the world of cosmetic surgery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your arguments.  You both are right on!  To highlight how difficult it will be to institute this &#8220;Bo-Tax,&#8221; here are a few examples from my own practice from the past week:</p>
<p>* 55-year-old woman receives Botox in her forehead for &#8220;vanity&#8221; (her own admission).  Neverthelss, her migraines disappear!  Was the Botox cosmetic?  Should she be taxed 5%?  Certainly, her very costly anti-migraine medications won&#8217;t be taxed 5%, so why should Botox?</p>
<p>* 27-year-old woman with very large breasts, which cause neck, back, and shoulder pain.  Her insurance company refused to cover the procedure, even though cosmesis was a secondary concern.  Post-operatively, her pain has resolved, and her insurance company no longer has to pay for physical therapy.  Does she pay the 5%?  Certainly, her breasts are now cuter, but was this a cosmetic surgery or a reconstructive surgery?</p>
<p>The Bo-Tax is too simplistic.  It ignores the &#8220;gray&#8221; in the world of cosmetic surgery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

